Category: Movies

  • Blood, Oil, and Deceit: Unraveling the Conspiracy in Killers of the Flower Moon

    Blood, Oil, and Deceit: Unraveling the Conspiracy in Killers of the Flower Moon

    Considering Scorsese’s film, David Grann’s 2017 book, and the FBI’s complicity in the massacre

    This story was originally published at Counter Arts Magazine.

    Scorsese’s film is another brutally honest look at how white supremacy won the American West. Not cowboys, but cowards. Powerful psychopaths who cheat, lie, and steal.

    David Grann’s 2017 book of the same title is a comprehensive look at the Osage massacre. It also takes a more critical perspective on the FBI and the federal government.

    This piece considers the differences between the book and the movie and the FBI’s role in hiding the accurate, staggering death count.

    Spoilers ahead! Read this after you see the movie!

    The Guardian System

    The movie uses a silent film framing device to explain the Osage backstory. Forcibly moved off their land two times, the Osage were given a reservation in Oklahoma by the federal government. Nobody knew it was rich in oil deposits.

    A map of the Osage reservation marked for its oil deposits — Credit: National Archive

    Grann cites the testimony of an Osage chief, Bacon Rind,

    [the whites had] bunched us down here in the backwoods, the roughest part of the United States, thinking ‘we will drive these Indians down to where there is a big pile of rocks and put them there in that corner.’” Now that the pile of rocks had turned out to be worth millions of dollars, he said, “everybody wants to get in here and get some of this money.” (88).

    Overnight, the tribe was wealthy. Grann describes a scene where oil drillers, like Daniel Plainview from There Will Be Blood (2007), come to bid on the rights, fighting each other to pay millions of dollars to drill Osage oil.

    Daniel Day-Lewis as Daniel Plainview buying oil rights in There Will Be Blood — Credit: Paramount

    Reservations are subject to national authority, so the federal government established the headright system. Oil companies paid dividends as a “headright” to Osage members who could prove blood heritage. To access the money, they required a guardian. So, while the money lawfully belonged to the Osage, the guardian system required Osage to get their checks cashed by a white man, someone directly inserted into their finances. Grann explains, “A full-blooded American Indian was invariably appointed a guardian, whereas a mixed-blood person rarely was.” (83)

    This racist system created the financial stakes for murder — a bureaucratic seizing of indigenous property.

    In the film, this legal system plays out clearest in the life of Henry Roan. A diagnosed “melancholic,” he needs Bill Hale to give him money to buy moonshine. Hale pretends to care for Roan’s safety, but really he’s waiting on a payout from Roan’s life insurance policy.

    A scan of the document certifying William Hale as Henry Roan’s Guardian — Credit: National Archives

    The oil industry and the federal government resented paying the Osage money for their oil rights. After fear-mongering news articles about Osage spending their money unwisely, Congress instituted even stricter guardianship laws. Osage with guardians could not withdraw more than a few thousand dollars a year, not even for exceptions like medical expenses (87), making a bad situation even worse.

    Then, after the Hale conviction, what finally stopped the massacre was another federal law. Federal legislation created and “solved” the problem. In 1932, the Osage petitioned the federal government to change the qualifications for collecting a head right. Grann summarizes, “It barred anyone who was not at least half Osage from inheriting head rights from a member of the tribe.” (242).

    While the FBI takes credit for solving the case, this legacy distracts from the federal government’s culpability for these crimes.

    FBI’s Legacy

    The FBI claims they intervened in Oklahoma after county, state, and private investigators and Congress didn’t stop the conspiracy. But Grann proves the FBI didn’t end the conspiracy either.

    In the movie, the tribal chief chastises Congress for making the tribe pay money to fund the federal investigation. It’s quaint to imagine an FBI so new they needed funding, but this is the FBI’s “first” case.

    The book presents an agency that doesn’t understand the ramifications of its actions. At first, Hoover sent ramshackle agents to interview suspicious, low-income white men and turn them into criminal informants. Multiple witnesses were killed because the investigation raised Bill Hale’s suspicions.

    The FBI cultivated informants like Blackie Thompson and let him commit state-sanctioned crimes to build evidence. This FBI tactic is still popular today. When Thompson broke out of jail, he robbed a bank and killed a local police officer (240).

    Hoover almost closed the case at the first sign of controversy. When a local lawyer, A.W. Comstock, was critical of the agency’s recklessness, Hoover started suspecting Comstock of the murders and encouraged investigators to pursue him as a lead (136).

    Hoover ignored the apparent pattern of murder despite his agents putting it directly into their reports. This is convincing evidence that the FBI was helping to perpetuate a coverup. From an FBI agent’s report,

    “An agent described, in a report, just one of the ways the killers did this: “In connection with the mysterious deaths of a large number of Indians, the perpetrators of the crime would get an Indian intoxicated, have a doctor examine him and pronounce him intoxicated, following which a morphine hypodermic would be injected into the Indian, and after the doctor’s departure the [killers] would inject an enormous amount of morphine under the armpit of the drunken Indian, which would result in his death. The doctor’s certificate would subsequently read ‘death from alcoholic poison.’” (307)

    Jesse Plemons as Tom White in Killers of the Flower Moon — Credit: Apple

    In the film, when Tom White arrives it relieves the tension. But was the FBI heroic?

    They only stopped three murderers out of a vast conspiracy of murderers. They had proof and witnesses of other criminal activity, begging the question, why did they stop investigating?

    As Grann proves, after the Hale conviction, Hoover promoted the case and made it into the FBI’s origin story. He realized “that the new modes of public relations could expand his bureaucratic power and instill a cult of personality…“ (240).

    The FBI’s origin story deliberately did not include Tom White. Hoover never publically thanked White for his contribution, although the Osage tribe did (241). Hoover steered White to offer selective information he could share with the press, “the representatives of the press would have an interest in would be the human interest aspect, so I would like to have you emphasize this angle.” (240). Through his brilliant use of implication, he’s asking White to downplay the conspiracy of lawlessness for oil extraction!

    When White asked for files to write a memoir on the case in 1958, Hoover declined. Nor was White allowed to consult on a Hollywood film about the Osage, The FBI Story (1959) with Jimmy Stewart (253).

    Grann cites how Hoover would send the story to “sympathetic reporters.” Here’s a headline from a William Randall Hearst syndicate paper.

    “NEVER TOLD BEFORE! — How the Government with the Most Gigantic Fingerprint System on Earth Fights Crime with Unheard-of Science Refinements; Revealing How Clever Sleuths Ended a Reign of Murder and Terror in the Lonely Hills of the Osage Indian Country, and Then Rounded Up the Nation’s Most Desperate Gang” (241)

    That headline is similar to the POV of the Scorsese movie.

    In the film, the Osage are primarily victims. The FBI convinces white guys to flip, saving the Osage from the deranged murderers.

    In reality, J. Edgar Hoover used the Osage just like the Hale family. The FBI built its investigation on years of intel gathered by the Osage and their hired investigators. Hoover came in at the end and took all of the credit. Hoover’s FBI also neglected to investigate others clearly implicated in this conspiracy — the coroner, the doctor, the sheriff, etc. Not so coincidentally, those not investigated were often wealthy and tied to oil companies. By hijacking this narrative, Hoover used the Osage murders to build the agency’s profile and to begin amassing a pool of federal dark money that let him do whatever he wanted.

    The Deeper Conspiracy

    The book’s final chapters examine new truths Grann discovered in the case, “a deeper, darker, even more terrifying conspiracy.” (258).

    Grann attempts to count how many people were killed, consulting federal and tribal archives of oral history, and finds manuscripts of unpublished interviews in Osage collections, newspaper obituaries, census records, and historian researchers. He estimates hundreds of Osage were murdered.

    The Osage call these years the “Reign of Terror” (264). Grann describes walking through the Osage graveyard, notices a pronounced increase in headstones from the period. According to the cited Authentic Osage Indian Roll Book, 605 Osage died over sixteen years, from 1907 to 1923 — more than 1.5 times the national rate. (307).

    While Bill Hale and his nephews were heinous criminals they were not unique. Collectively, the community murdered hundreds of Osage for their head rights. Hale and his nephews conspired together for the oil money, as did the town. On the book’s last page, Grann concludes, “Indeed, virtually every element of society was complicit in the murderous system.” (316).

    I thought Scorsese’s film did a fantastic job of literalizing this. The Klan marches in the town parade, and the Grand Wizard is a city official. Every town official comes together to coach Ernest on lying under oath.

    And Scorsese even includes a grander conspiracy. The book mentions Bill Hale: “…often wore a diamond-studded pin from the Masonic lodge…” (30). In the film, they personified this as Hale, a 32nd-degree mason, paddling his nephew.

    Grann finds almost no information about the tribal advocate who was assassinated while traveling to Washington. Scorsese dramatizes this by showing the man receiving a note right before his assassination, which raises a fascinating question. How did those Okies in Fairfax hire a hitman in Washington, D.C.?

    So …Did You Hate the Movie?

    NO! I loved it! I’m not trying to cancel the movie, say it was racist, evil, or I didn’t like it. That would be a dull argument. Who cares if I liked it or not?

    A movie costing 200 million dollars cannot be critical of the FBI. Interesting!

    Racism is a necessary part of the Osage story. The way Bill Hale and Ernest Burkhart could compartmentalize their lives to both love Osage and plot their extermination is only possible because of white supremacy. They thought they deserved the money, a deeply internalized manifest destiny.

    Yet, federal legislation, FBI negligence, and a deep conspiracy of rich oil drillers show that racism wasn’t only in Oklahoma but throughout all of America. The federal government is racist, as is the state government, especially in the context of drilling for oil. Like everything in the 20th century, oil fueled America’s genocidal quest.

    Works Cited

    The Killers of the Flower Moon, David Grann, 2017, Vintage

    The United States Government National Archive 12

  • Every Saw Movie Ranked Best to Worst

    Every Saw Movie Ranked Best to Worst

    Us Saw sickos want to think about all ten Saw movies! This list ranks the franchise from best to worst.

    Would you like to play a game? I created a Saw Score Card to grade each film on six criteria. I think the best Saws have creepy traps, gory kills, soap opera plots, a baffling twist at the end, cast recognizable celebrities to endure torture, and all shoehorned in a nonsense canon chronology. The more confusing, the better. I also made a bloody gears scorecard template with Canva, the perfect tool for creepy crafters like me.

    I ranked the films by these criteria and ordered the list from best to worst because it’s less confusing that way. By all means, brutally murder me in the comments if you disagree with my ratings. Trigger Warning for discussions of torture, gore, and spoilers for all the Saw movies.

    #1: Saw

    Cary Elwes as Dr. Lawrence Gordon in Saw — Credit: Lionsgate

    It spawned a ten-film franchise, predicted escape rooms, ignited the 2000s “torture porn” horror subgenre, and introduced Jigsaw, The Game Playing Serial Killer. Saw is a great horror movie. Its core premise of waking up chained to a pipe in a dirty bathroom is genuinely terrifying. The grime and rough edges make the vibe intense and the confusing plot forgivable. I argue Jigsaw is one of the twenty-first century’s most prolific Hollywood movie monsters. A frail, old, rich psychopath with no conscience and nothing to lose! The movie is quintessentially 2004: handheld digital cameras, music video style editing, and a flip phone provide essential plot development, with nu-metal credit sequences bookending the film. Yet it’s right before the moment cell phones became ubiquitous because pagers, chorded phones, and tape recorders are still vital plot points. The traps are practical, simple, and have incredible prop design. If you enjoy horror movies, Saw is essential for 2000s Hollywood horror.

    Best Death/Trap? The Bathroom is iconic, but it has to be The Reverse Bear Trap that rips your head open mouth first. One of the few escapes in the series!

    Saw Wins. The Only Must Watch On This List. The First Is The Best — Credit: Canvaa, created by author

    #2: Saw II

    Shawnee Smith as Amanda Young in Saw II — Credit: Lionsgate

    How did they follow up the Locked Room indie horror hit? They gave them more money and opened up a whole haunted house! Jigsaw makes wacky traps like a wrist-splitting box or a gunshot door peephole and uses the cartoonish bad guy classic of “sleeping gas” to knock people out. Amanda’s back brings an exciting twist requiring a DVD burner — a plot almost as 2006 as her haircut. We meet the dumbest character in the series: a crooked cop, played by Donnie Wahlberg, Mark’s big brother and former Marky Mark and the Funky Bunch member. As each film explains, Jigsaw has informants in the City of Saw PD who work together to punish criminals and themselves.

    Best Death/Trap? The needle pit. The needles get jabbed in the skin as the hands search for the key. Plus, when I was a teen, there was an urban legend that creeps go to clubs to stick people with AIDS needles. I imagined this was the pit where they got all the needles.

    Saw II, More Traps, Less Sense, A Big Haunted House — Credit: Canvaa, created by author

    #3: Saw X

    Tobin Bell as John Kramer the Jigsaw Killer — Credit: Lionsgate

    Saw X is the first Saw movie in almost 20 years that feels like an actual movie, not a confusing money laundering scheme. A comprehendible plot, a good twist that makes sense, and an actual justification for why the tortured people deserve it. Cancerman Jigsaw John makes a compelling protagonist, and the Elizabeth Theranos-esque villainess manages to be eviler than Jigsaw. Plus, Pigsaw Amanda (from Saw 1–7) helps make things actually scary and not just gross. I was scared because I didn’t know what would happen next despite this movie being a prequel, and I actually know what happens next.

    It is really gross, though. I had to step out to the lobby to wait for some torture to end, and when I connected to the AMC Stubbs A-List Wifi, I had a quick existential crisis that obsessively watching and cataloging all the Saw movies might be a waste of life, and by Jigsaw rules thereby punishable by a painful test.

    The tenth is not as silly as the preceding 8 movies, and I personally prefer the big-aughts silliness and stupidity to the gritty and gory humanizing of Jigsaw. I see Jigsaw as a deranged terrorist or monster who’s impossible to identify with, kinda of like Michael Meyers or Freddy Krueger.

    But I must admit, they rebooted the franchise correctly. The movie is not stupid like most of the Saw movies. Everything’s in its right place. It actually has the same score as Saw II! I used kills as the tiebreaker, as Saw X has the lowest body count in franchise history, with only six. Plus, I prefer Saw II because it’s a haunted house movie.

    Saw X, a respectiable Saw Movie — Credit: Canvaa, created by author

    #4: Saw 3D: The Final Chapter

    Costas Mandylor as Mark Hoffman in Saw 3D: The Final Chapter— Credit: Lionsgate

    Saw 3D: The Final Chapter concludes Jigsaw’s confusing, gory glory in extra dimensions. The framing story is fun: a guy fakes being a Jigsaw victim for clout and publishes a harrowing memoir. He scams support groups for Jigsaw victims. Dozens of people across the City of Saw huddle each night in church basements to cope with Jigsaw’s tests.

    The kills are Giallo-style silly gore, and blood flies from the screen in 3D because, in 2010, everything was 3D after the success of Avatar. And the plot is full of soap opera drama and canon shenanigans. Jigsaw’s wife is back, and the half-face cop goes nuts. We finally see what happened to the doctor from Saw! The face ripper mask finally goes off! Two dangling people have a kickfight over a sharp metal fan! This one is funny, fast, and playful, the Saw III that should have been.

    Best Death/Trap? Linkin Park’s Chester Bennington plays a Neo-Nazi who gets melted to death in a car for one of the best deaths in the series. It’s on YouTube.

    Saw 3D Answers The Questions And Brutally Murders Linkin Park — Credit: Canvaa, created by author

    #5: Saw IV

    Donny Wahlberg as Eric Matthews and Costas Mandylor as Mark Hoffman — Credit: Lionsgate

    Jigsaw’s dead, and things get grosser, dumber, and more overwrought with contrived explanations for how Jigsaw strikes from beyond the grave. During Jigsaw’s autopsy, the cops find a tape in his stomach announcing he’s still playing games! Mark Hoffman replaces as a creeper evil psycho cop. Jigsaw grooms him into setting traps and carrying out his vision of skin ripping, skin sewing, and lots of gross skin stuff. The plot’s full of Jigsaw lore, introducing us to the Bride of Jigsaw and Jigsaw’s Attorney! We learn Jigsaw used to be a “non-profit” real estate developer who redeveloped urban factories into low-income housing until a guy carelessly opened a door too hard and hit his pregnant wife with a doorknob, causing her to miscarry. And right after that? He gets diagnosed with cancer! Jigsaw snapped. He’s been redeveloping his factories into torture factories.

    Best Death/Trap? They make Donny put a noose around his neck and stand on a gigantic melting ice cube. Once it melts, two cubes smash his head. My favorite gruesome execution of the series. It’s so dumb, and it’s also on YouTube.

    Saw IV Warns Us, Open Doors Slowly Because Of Horrible Consequences — Credit: Canvaa, created by the author

    #6: Saw VI

    Peter Outerbridge as William Easton in Saw VI — Credit: Lionsgate

    It’s 2009! Jigsaw Vs. The Health Insurance! Jigsaw’s torturing the creeps who deserve it most: predatory lenders, insurance actuaries, lawyers, and brokers. “It’s a business! My decisions aren’t made this way!” the insurance attorney screams as he decides which employee’s life to save. That same guy denied Jigsaw treatment for his cancer. The traps are silly and look carnivalesque. The plot is simple, but the twist is alright. Saw IV was the end of torture porn. Paranormal Activity would make $193 million that year, or 839 times its $230,000 budget! Goodbye, torture porn, hello found footage, as the American empire stops shock and awe and starts the surveillance era.

    Best Death/Trap? The shotgun scary-go-round is one of six traps with a shotgun rigged up to shoot somebody in the face, but it is the only shotgun trap with a carousel. It’s also a reminder that your boss would probably prefer to murder you before facing consequences or experiencing discomfort.

    Saw VI Sees Jigsaw Get FIRE Pilled, And We’re Here For It King — Credit: Canvaa, created by author

    #7: Spiral: From the Book of Saw

    Chris Rock as Detective Zeke Banks in Spiral — Credit: Lionsgate

    A provocative failed reboot. When this came out, everybody said it stunk, and compared to the average Chris Rock or Samuel L. Jackson movie, it stinks. But compared to Saw movies? It’s mid.

    Chris Rock pretends to be an angry cop, yells every line, and does standup bits about divorce while investigating grizzly crime scenes. Samuel L. Jackson plays his dad and gets a hilarious fake mustache! Ultimately, they try to make a big political statement about police shootings, string up Jackson in this wacky cyborg trap, and reveal one of the funniest traps in the series. Critical dramatic moments come through braindead dialogue like “Fuck me? No. Fuck you!”

    It’s missing two crucial Saw tropes. There’s no Tobin Bell, so I had to subtract a point. There are also no confusing continuity explanations, and the plot is miserably boring with a telegraphed twist. Nevertheless, the traps are high-budget, and genuine celebrities are getting tortured!

    Best Death/Trap? The cop who must cut out his tongue or get hit by a subway train. That must hurt!

    Spiral Tried So Hard But Didn’t Get Far Because, In The End, They Kept The Franchise Canon — Credit: Canvaa, created by author

    #8: Jigsaw

    The Bucket Room Trap in Jigsaw— Credit: Lionsgate

    The boring reboot. More flashbacks, more cops, more complicated mythos. Saw II had a house, and Jigsaw had a barn. John was sneaking off on the weekends to convert a farm into a torture factory to teach people lessons. A decade after his death, it started killing people. Is it the real guy!? No, it’s the cops that Jigsaw trained, which isn’t surprising because that’s who it is in every movie. This one is confusing. The traps are barn-themed, and the kills. There isn’t a twist.

    Best Death/Trap? The Grain Silo Trap. Two people fall into a grain silo, and they will die by corn, drowning in corn. A different guy doesn’t chop his leg up with a lever and some jagged blades.

    Jigsaw Was The Reboot That Didn’t, In A Barn — Credit: Canvaa, created by author

    #9: Saw V

    Scott Patterson as Peter Strahm — Credit: Lionsgate

    Jigsaw grooms a cop and tortures real estate developers. Directed by the franchise’s production designer, David Hackl, I thought the traps were evocative of the Iraqi invasion and Abu Grave: hand-crushing boxes, waterboarding, decapitations, nails and glass used for improvised explosive devices, and jumper cable electrocution. The plot is horrible. Not enough, Tobin. It’s a lousy cop procedural about two cops who look too much alike, so it’s hard to tell them apart. The beginning is also the ending of III and IV, I guess? This one has the lowest kill count since the first movie. Thus, it’s boring.

    Best Death & Trap: Ten Pints of Sacrifice. Two people must fill ten pints of blood by touching a circular saw, or IEDs would blow up right next to them and impale them with nails.

    Saw V Isn’t Good, But Its Cool Political Allegory Traps Saved It From Last Place — Credit: Canvaa, created by author

    #10: Saw III

    Dina Meyer as Allison Carry in Saw III — Credit: Lionsgate

    Saw III has the same structure as Saw II without the good traps, silly story, or humor. Instead, it has vague Christian undertones and a chain-filled sadomasochistic relationship between Jigsaw John and Amanda. A lot of fans like this one, but I hate it. The kills are very gory and have a severe and depressing vibe — graphic imagery like a brain tumor extraction or Donnie Wahlberg smashing his ankle with a toilet lid adds to this. Few games get played. Mostly, they just mess with a sad guy whose son died. We see Amanda set up traps in the first two movies. Plus, Amanda’s games suck. The people playing can’t escape by ripping their ears off or whatever. The last twist is stupid and gets retconned away. In a franchise known for being often ridiculous, confusing, disgusting, and dull, this one is the best example of the franchise’s flaws.

    Best Death/Trap? While the traps in Jeff’s trial are interesting (the scary freezer, the vat of pig carcasses, the crucifix), the games aren’t much fun because the victim can’t escape. I suppose the Angel Trap is best because it’s insane, metal angel wings and robot arms that rip a cop’s ribcage apart if she doesn’t dunk her hand in a vat of acid. Confusing, senseless, gory, somewhat funny?

    Boring And Sad, Saw III And Its Daddy Issues Come In Last Place — Credit: Canvaa, created by author

    Live or Die?

    Death is a reason to reflect, and in the Saw franchise, there are 101 deaths and 115 traps, so that’s a lot of reflection and a low survival rate.

    Why do these movies exist? Like many media created in the 2000s, the Saw franchise is stupid, offensive, reactionary, rude, silly, intensely violent, and bizarre. Like a gore video, your friend showed you how to make you throw up. Twenty years ago, I watched Saw at a sleepover, and then a year later, we snuck into Saw II. We screamed and squirmed at the simulated torture.

    Twenty years later, Saw X is as good as any of the other sequels.

    And me? I’m still wondering what I would do if I woke up naked, chained in a dirty bathroom, with a key in my intestine, or something insane.

    Follow along at home with your own Saw Score Ranking Calculator. Here’s a Google Sheet with all the movies, criteria, traps, and kills, updated with Saw X. Enjoy!

    What do you think? Should I live or die? Comment below.